In an attempt to better understand issues of diversity in the college and university classroom, the authors applied two conceptual approaches—the threshold concepts framework and intersectionality—to the study of diversity as a complex, multi-faceted reality, which all instructors confront and sometimes resist at various points in their careers. An examination of qualitative data from open-ended questions on a survey about diversity in the classroom revealed the strength of these two approaches to elucidate hidden instructional complexities. Applying the threshold concept framework through an intersectional lens suggests that the learner’s confrontation with new information may be troublesome and disorienting as graduate student teachers described difficulties with their own and their students’ identities. The data also reveal the reality of different phases in which the instructors appear to stagnate, begin to realize the need to engage with diversity, then begin to transit and exit the disoriented or liminal space. Because the instructors’ transition—from being a teacher who cannot deal with diversity to a teacher who can—appears to be challenging, the authors conclude that issues of diversity in the classroom can be clarified and understood using the threshold theory framework and intersectionality approach in the education and preparation of future faculty. Graduate and professional student developers centrally and within disciplines need programming to help graduate student teachers move successfully through the liminal space to teach contemporary collegiate undergraduates most effectively.
American Association of Colleges and Universities (2011). The drama of diversity and democracy. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/publications/DramaofDiversity_2011.pdf
Anthias, F. (2011). Intersections and Translocations: New paradigms for thinking about cultural diversity and social identities. European Educational Research Journal, 10(2), 204-217.
Austin, A. E., Campa, H., Pfund, C., Gillian-Daniel, D. L., Mathieu, R., & Stoddart, J. (2009). Preparing STEM doctoral students for future faculty careers. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 117, 83-95.
Bender, B., & Devanas, M. (2012). Embracing threshold competencies and concepts as an educational model for the professional development of PhD students. Poster presented at the Fourth Biennial Conference on Threshold Concepts: From Personal Practice to Communities of Practice, 28-29 June 2012. Trinity College: Dublin.
Berelson. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. New York: The Free Press.
Border, L., & Chism, N. (1992). Teaching for diversity, New Directions in Teaching and Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Border, L. & Thacker Thomas, D. (2014, July). Traversing the liminal space: An Analysis of graduate student responses to diversity in the classroom context. Paper presented at the 5th Biennial Threshold Concepts International Conference, Durham, England.
Cagney, A. G., Coughlan, P., & Andrews, L. (2012, June). Doctoral education at the â€˜eyeâ€™ of the perfect storm. Pech Kucha presented at the 4th Biennial Threshold Concepts Conference and 6th NAIRTL Annual Conference: Threshold Concepts in Doctoral Supervision, Dublin, Ireland.
Collins, P. (2000). Black feminist Thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299.
Freeman, G., Faulkner, R., Izzard, M., & Charles, J. (2012). University School of Education promoting diversity awareness and initiatives. The Professional Educator, 36(1), 1â€“7.
Gaff, J. (2002). The disconnect: Graduate education and faculty Work: A review of recent research, Liberal Education, â€œChanging Course: Preparing Faculty for the future. 88(3), 6-13.
Gordon, E., Ralston Brownell, C., & Brittell, J, K. (1972). Harlem Prep
(Report No. UD 016 142 New York City, New York: National Center for Educational Communication. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 099458)
Gray, J. & Densten, I. (1998). Integrating quantitative and qualitative analysis using latent and manifest variables. Quality and Quantity, 32(4), 419â€“431.
Hair, H. F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R. I., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hancock, A. (2007). When multiplication doesn't equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5(1), 63-79.
JuÃ¡rez, B., Smith, D., & Hayes, C. (2008). Justice means just us white people: The diversity paradox in teacher education. Democracy & Education, 17(3), 20â€“25.
Kristeva, J. (2004). Psychoanalysis and modernity. Albany, New York: University of New York Press.
Land, R., Meyers, J. H. F., & Smith, J. (2008). Threshold concepts within the disciplines (Vol. 16). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. ixâ€“x.
Land, R., & Meyer, J. H. F. (2010). Threshold concepts and troublesome: Dynamics of Assessment. In, R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, & C. Baillie (Eds.), Threshold Concepts and Transformational Learning (pp. 61-79). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Larkin, D. (2012). Using the conceptual change model of learning as an analytic tool in researching teacher preparation for student diversity. Teachers College Record, 114(8), 1â€“35.
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge 1â€”Linkages to ways of thinking and practising. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student
learningâ€”Ten years on (pp. 412-424). Oxford: OCSLD.
Meyer, J. and Land, R. (2006). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Issues of liminality, In: Meyer, J. and Land, R. (eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge, London and New York: Routledge, 19â€“32.
Morrell, J. (2010). Teacher preparation and diversity: When American preservice teachers arenâ€™t white and middle class. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 12(1), 1â€“17.
Motoko, A. (2011). Identifying program characteristics for preparing pre-service teachers for diversity. Teachers College Record, 113(3), 658â€“697.
Nieto, S., Rivera, M., & Quinones, S. (2012). Connecting the interpersonal, instructional, and institutional contexts. Association of Mexican-American Educators, 6(3), 30-36.
Parsad, B., Lewis, L., & Farris, E. (2001). Teacher preparation and professional development: 2000 (NCES 2001-088). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved March 22, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2001/2001088.pdf
Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167â€“199.
POD Network. (2014). http://podnetwork.org
Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4â€“15.
Renn, K. A. (2012). Complex ecologies of identity, diversity, teaching, and learning. In J. E. Groccia, & L. Cruz (Eds.) To Improve the Academy, Vol.31 (pp. 261â€“276). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Schwandt, T. (2007). The sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(4), 4â€“14.
Sinatra, G. M. (2005). The â€œwarming trendâ€ in conceptual change research: The legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 107â€“115.
Sinatra, G. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Timmermans, J. (2010). Changing our minds: The developmental potential of threshold concepts. In J. H. F. Meyer, R. Land., & C. Baillie (Eds.), Threshold concepts and transformational learning (pp. 3-19). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Thomas, K., Tran, N., & Dawson, B. (2010). An inclusive strategy of Teaching diversity. Advances in Developing Human Resources. 12(3), 295â€“311.
Wisker, G. and Claesson, S. (2013) The impact of cross-disciplinary culture on studentâ€“supervisor perceptions, International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 8, 22â€“37.
Weisbuch, R. (2005). The responsive Ph.D.: Innovations in U.S. doctoral education. The Woodrow Wilson Foundation.