Abstract
Within Medical Education students more readily engage with the ‘hard’ sciences seeing sociology, psychology and ethics as ‘nice’ rather than ‘need’ to know. Yet within the published literature, there has been little research into students’ experiences of these subjects. In this paper we discuss a research method that allows the application of threshold concept theory to the exploration of the process of ‘non-biomedical science learning in medical education’.
16 students from a UK medical school were asked to record on their smart phones, their experiences of ‘doctor facilitated’ small group sessions. The students uploaded their recordings to a secure drop box facility and recordings were removed daily and transcribed. 68 transcripts were analysed for both substantive concepts and exemplars (within students’ language) of threshold concept criteria. Concepts were then cross-referenced against threshold criteria. Where concepts appeared to meet the criteria of transformation, liminality, integration and troublesomeness we speculated that these might be ‘threshold’.
Audio diaries appear to be a promising methodology for applying threshold concept theory to understanding learning. The study provided an insight into students’ experiences. We learned that our students currently re-appropriate sociological ideas to the medical setting often finding new terminologies situated in their own ‘student speak’. We were able to spot gaps in their learning and notice how and where students get ‘stuck’. A resolvable limitation is we were unable to test for irreversibility. We also found little evidence of boundedness leading us to speculate about the nature of threshold concepts in the non-biomedical sciences.
References
Barradell, S. (2013). The identification of threshold concepts: a review of theoretical complexities and methodological challenges. Higher Education, 65(2), 265–276.
Begun, J. W., & Rieker, P. P. (1980). Social science in medicine: The question of relevance. Journal of Medical Education, 55(3), 181–185.
Benbasset, J., Baumal, R., Borkan, J., & Ber, R. (2003). Overcoming barriers to teaching the behavioural and social sciences to medical students. Academic Medicine. 78(4), 372–380.
Branch, W. T. (2005). Use of Critical Incident Reports in Medical Education. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20(11), 1063–1067.
Cassell, C., & Symon, G. (2005). Essential Guide to Qualitative methods in Organisational Research. London: Sage.
Clouder, L. (2005). Caring as a ‘threshold concept: Transforming students in higher education into health(care) professionals’ Teaching in Higher Education 10(4), 505–517.
Cousin, G. (2006). An introduction to threshold concepts. Planet, 17(1), 4-5. doi: 10.11120/plan.2006.00170004
Cousin, G. (2009). Transactional Curriculum Inquiry: Researching Threshold Concepts. In G. Cousin, Researching Learning in Higher Education: An Introduction to Contemporary Methods and Approaches, pp. 201-212. Abingdon: Routledge.
Cuff, P. A., & Vaneslow. N. A. (Eds.) (2004). Improving medical education: enhancing the behavioral and social science content of medical school curricula. Washington: National Academies Press.
Dacey, M. L., & Weintrob, J. (1973). Human behaviour: the teaching of social and behavioural sciences in medical schools. Social Science and Medicine, 7(12), 943–957.
Field, D. (1988). Teaching sociology in UK medical schools. Medical Education, 22(4), 294-300.
Denzin, N., K. & Lincoln. Y. S. (Eds.) (2005). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative
Research.Thousand Oaks: Sage.
General Medical Council. (1993). Tomorrow’s Doctors: Recommendations on Undergraduate Medical Education. London: General Medical Council.
General Medical Council. (2003). Tomorrow’s Doctors: Recommendations on Undergraduate Medical Education. London: General Medical Council.
General Medical Council. (2009). Tomorrow’s Doctors: Recommendations on Undergraduate Medical Education. London: General Medical Council.
Giddens, A., & Sutton. P. (2014). Essential Concepts in Sociology. Cambridge: Polity
Hafferty, F. W., & Levinson, D. (2008). Moving beyond nostalgia and motives: towards a complexity science view of medical professionalism. Perspectives in Biology and medicine, 51(4), 599–615.
Hall, B. (2006). Teaching and learning uncertainty in science: the case of climate change, Planet, 17(1), 48-49. doi: 10.11120/plan.2006.00170048
Harden, R. (2000). The integration ladder a tool for curriculum planning and integration. Medical Education, 33(7), 551–557.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1986). Ethnography; Principles in Practice. New York: Tavistock.
Holloway, M., Alpay, E., & Bull, A. (2009). A Quantitative Approach to Identifying Threshold Concepts in Engineering Education. The Higher Education Academy Engineering Subject Centre, Retrieved from: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/subjects/engineering/EE2010/101_GP_Holloway.pdf (accessed 31.7.12)
Hunt, G & Sobal, J. (1990). Teaching medical sociology in medical schools,
Teaching sociology, 18(3), 319-328.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Knight, L., & Mattick, K. (2006). When I first came here I thought medicine was black and white: making sense of medical students’ ways of knowing. Social Science and Medicine, 63(4), 1084–1096.
Land, R., Cousin, G., Meyer, J. H. F., & Davies, P. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (3): implications for course design and evaluation. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving Student Learning - diversity and inclusivity Proceedings of the 12th Improving Student Learning Conference. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development (OCSLD), pp. 53-64. Retrieved from:
http://www.brookes.ac.uk/services/ocsld/isl/isl2004/abstracts/conceptual_papers/ISL04-pp53-64-Land-et-al.pdf (accessed 17.10.14)
Litva, A., & Peters, S. (2008). Exploring barriers to teaching behavioural and social sciences in medical education. Medical Education, 42(3), 309–314.
Matthew, R. G., & Pritchard, J. (2009). Hard and Soft: a useful way of thinking about the disciplines? In C. Kreber (Ed.), The University and its Disciplines, pp. 58-69. New York: Routledge.
Monrouxe, L. V. (2009). Solicited audio diaries in longitudinal narrative research: a view from inside. Qualitative Research, 9, 81-103.
Neve, H., & Collett, T. (2014). Revealing the hidden curriculum to medical students: insights from threshold concept theory. Paper presented at the Fifth International Biennial Threshold Concepts Conference, Threshold Concepts in Practice, Durham University, UK, 9-11 July 2014. Retrieved from:
Abstract: http://www.ee.ucl.ac.uk/~mflanaga/abstracts/TC14Abstract32.pdf
Shinners-Kennedy, D. (2014). How NOT to identify threshold concepts,
Fifth International Biennial Threshold Concepts Conference, Threshold Concepts in Practice, Durham University, UK, 9-11 July 2014. Retrieved from:
Abstract: http://www.ee.ucl.ac.uk/~mflanaga/abstracts/TC14Abstract48.pdf (accessed 17.10.14)
Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1992). Transfer of Learning. In T. Husen & T. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education, 2nd Ed (Vol. 11). Oxford: Pergamon Press. Retrieved from: https://learnweb.harvard.edu/alps/thinking/docs/traencyn.htm
Perkins, D. N. (2008). Beyond understanding. In R. Land, J. F. H. Meyer & J. Smith (Eds.),Threshold Concepts within the disciplines. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers
Taylor, C. (2008). Threshold concepts, troublesome knowledge and ways of thinking and practising – can we tell the difference in biology? In R. Land, J. F. H. Meyer & J. Smith (Eds.),Threshold Concepts within the disciplines. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers
Todd, A. R. (Chair) (1968). Report of the Royal Commission on Medical Education 1965 – 1968, London: HMSO.
Tronto, J. (1993). Moral Boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care. London: Routledge.
Scambler, G. (2009). Sociology in Medical Education. In C. Brosnan & B, Turner (Eds.),Handbook of the Sociology of Medical Education. London: Routledge.
Wilson, A., Ã…kerlind, G., Francis, P., Kirkup, L., McKenzie, J., Pearce, D., & Sharma, M.D. (2010) Measurement uncertainty as a threshold concept in physics. In Proceedings of the 16th UniServe Science Annual Conference, Creating ACTIVE Minds in our Science and Mathematics students, 29th September to 1st October, 2010, University of Sydney, pp. 98-103. Retrieved from: http://escholarship.library.usyd.edu.au/journals/index.php/IISME/article/viewFile/4686/5474 (accessed 16 October 2014)
Zander, C., Boustedt, J., Eckerdal, A., McCartney, A., Mostrom, R., Erik, J., Ratcliffe, M., & Sanders, K. (2008). Threshold concepts in computer science: a multi-national empirical investigation. In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer & J, Smith (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines, pp. 105–118. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers