Research suggests traditional written feedback may fail to adequately engage significant numbers of current higher education (HE) students. In recent years, university cohorts across wide-ranging disciplines have embraced audio feedback favourably, viewing it as a valuable strategy for enhancing capacity to learn confidently, competently and autonomously. Current understanding of audio feedback effectiveness with sports coaching students is limited, which is surprising considering coaching is an area where effective feedback provision is fundamental to athlete learning, motivation and progression. Employing surveys and semi-structured interviews, this study provides insight into the expectations and experiences of an undergraduate sport coaching cohort at a United Kingdom (UK) university after receiving summative assessment audio feedback for the first time. Student views were positively framed, providing strong evidence of the approaches value in supporting feedback literacy development and feeding forward. Implications to aid future practice and policy are discussed.
Allin, L., & Fishwick, L. (2009). Engaging sport students in assessment and formative feedback. learning and teaching guides. Higher Education Academy Network for Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism.
Bond, S. (2009). Audio feedback. London: LSE
Booroff, M., Nelson, L., & Potrac, P. (2016). A coach’s political use of video-based feedback: a case study in elite-level academy soccer. Journal of Sports Sciences, 34, 116-124.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
Brearley, F., & Cullen, W. (2012). Providing students with formative audio feedback. Bioscience Education, 20, 22-36.
Brown, S. (2015). Learning, Teaching and Assessment in Higher Education: Global Perspectives. London: Palgrave-MacMillan.
Cann, A. (2014). Engaging students with audio feedback. Bioscience Education, 22, 31-41.
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43, 1315-1325.
Carruthers, C., McCarron, B., Bolan, P., Devine, A., McMahon-Beattie, U., & Burns, A. (2014). I like the sound of that: an evaluation of providing audio feedback via the virtual learning environment for summative assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40, 352-370.
Chalmers, C., MacCallum, J., Mowat, E., & Fulton, N. (2014). Audio feedback: richer language but no measurable impact on student performance. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 8, 64-73.
Davis, C., & Ryder, A. (2012). Using an old technology in a new way or using a new technology in an old way? exploring the use of audio feedback post teaching observation”. Middlesex Journal of Educational Technology, 2, 30-40.
Dixon, S. (2015). The pastoral potential of audio feedback: a review of the literature. Pastoral care in Education, 33, 96-104.
Dowden, T., Pittaway, S., Yost, H., & McCarthy, R. (2011). Students perceptions of written feedback in teacher education: ideally feedback is a continuing two-way communication that encourages progress. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher education, 38, 349-362.
Duncan, N. (2007). Feed-forward: improving students use of tutors’ comments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 271-283.
Fawcett, H., & Oldfield, J. (2016). Teaching in higher education: investigating expectations and experiences of audio and written assignment feedback in first-year undergraduate students. Teaching in Higher education, 21, 79-93.
Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports student learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher education, 1, 3-31.
Gleaves, A., & Walker, C. (2012). Richness, redundancy or relational salience? a comparison of the effect of textual and aural feedback modes on knowledge elaboration in higher education students work. Computers and Education, 62, 249-261.
Glover, C., & Brown, E. (2006). Written feedback for students: too much, too detailed or too incomprehensible to be effective? Bioscience Education, 7, 1-16.
Groves, M., Bowd, B., & Smith, J. (2010). Facilitating experiential learning of study skills in sports students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34, 11-22
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.
Hayman, R. (2018). Using audio for summative assessment feedback: experiences of work-based postgraduate sport coaching students. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6, 13-21.
Hayman, R., Allin, L., & Coyles, A. (2017). Exploring social integration of sport students during the transition to university. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 5, 31-36.
Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Irwin, B., Parkin, H., & Thorpe, L. (2011). Using technology to encourage student engagement with feedback: a literature review. Research in Learning Technology, 19, 117-127.
Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2002). The conscientious consumer: reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 53-64.
Ice, P., Curtis, P., Phillips, D., & Wells, J. (2007). Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and students sense of community. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11, 1-5.
Jackson, M. (2012). Improving the assessment feedback experience: a case study. Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences, 4, 1-7.
Jones, C., Reichard, C., & Mokhtari, K. (2003). Are students learning styles discipline specific? Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 27, 363-375.
Knauf, H. (2016). Reading, listening and feeling: audio feedback as a component of an inclusive learning culture at universities. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 442-449.
King, D., McGugan, S., & Bunyan. N. (2008). Does it make a difference? replacing text with audio feedback. Practice and Evidence of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 3, 145-163.
Lau, L. (2008). Use of audio feedback to foster a sense of care in learning progress in an online module. Higher Education Academy.
Laughton, D. (2013). Using audio feedback to enhance assessment practice: an evaluation of student and tutor experiences. Student Engagement and Experience Journal, 2, 1-20.
Lipnevich, A., Berg, D., & Smith, K. (2016). Towards a model of student response to feedback In Human Factors and Social Conditions in Assessment, edited by G Brown and L Harris, 169-185.New Yourk, Routledge.
Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2008). Feedback on assessment: student perceptions of quality and effectiveness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 263-275.
Lunt, T., & Curran, J. (2010). Are you listening please? the advantages of electronic audio feedback compared to written feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 759-769.
Macgregor, G., Spiers, A., & Taylor, C. (2011). Exploratory evaluation of audio email technology in formative assessment feedback. Research in Learning Technology, 19, 1, 39-59.
McClery, S., & Wilkie, J. (2009). Pastoral support to undergraduates in higher education. The International Journal of Management Education, 8, 23-36.
McFarlane, K., & Wakeman, C. (2011). Using audio feedback for summative purposes. Innovative Practice in Higher Education, 1, 1-20.
McGarvey, D., & Haxton, K. (2011). Using audio for feedback on assessments: tutor and student experiences. New Directions, 7, 5-9.
Merry, S., & Orsmond, P. (2007). Feedback via mp3 audio files. Centre for Bioscience Bulletin, 5.
Merry, S. & Orsmond, P. (2008). Student attitudes to and usage of academic feedback provided via audio files. Bioscience Education, 11, 1-11.
Middleton, A. (2011). Digital voices: making stronger connections with the recorded voice. Educational Developments, 12, 6-8.
Moore, C., &Wallace, I. (2012). Personalizing feedback for feed-forward opportunities utilizing audio feedback technologies for online students. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management, and eLearning, 2, 6-10.
Morris, C., & Chikwa, G. (2016). Audio versus written feedback: exploring learners’ preference and the impact of feedback format on students’ academic performance. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17, 125-137.
Mouratidis, A., Vansteenk, M., Lens, W., & Sideridis, G. (2008). The motivating role of positive feedback in sport and physical education: evidence for a motivational model. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 240-268
Munroe, W., & Hollingworth, L. (2014). Audio feedback to physiotherapy students for viva voce: how effective is the living voice? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 865-878.
Nelson, L., Potrac, P., & Groom, R. (2014). Receiving video-based feedback in elite ice-hockey: a players perspective. Sport, Education and Society, 19, 19-40.
Nichol, D. (2009). Assessment for learner self-regulation: enhancing achievement in the first-year using learning technologies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34, 335-352.
Nichol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback process in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 501-517.
NSS (2017). National student survey results 2017. Accessed July 5th 2018. www.hefce.ac.uk/lt/nss/results/2017/
Olesova, L., & Richardson. J. (2011). Using asynchronous instructional audio feedback in online environments: a mixed methods study. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7, 30-42.
Parks, M., & Fletcher, P. (2017). A longitudinal quantitative study of student attitudes towards audio feedback for assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42, 1046-1053.
Peters, D., Jones, G., & Peters, J. (2008). Preferred learning styles in students studying sports-related programs in higher education in the united kingdom. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 155-166.
Price, M., Handley, J., Millar, B., and O`Donovan, P. (2010). Feedback: all that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 277-289.
Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education”. 2nd edition. London, Routledge.
Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. (2012). Should online doctoral instructors adopt audio feedback as an instructional strategy? preliminary evidence elements of an effective learning experience in online education. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 245-25
Rodway-Dyer, S., J. Knight, & E. Dunne. (2011). A case study on audio feedback with geography undergraduates. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35, 217-231.
Rotheram, B. (2009). sounds good: using audio to give assessment feedback. Assessment, Teaching & Learning Journal, 7, 22-24.
Rowe, A. (2011). The personal dimension in teaching: why students value feedback. International Journal of Educational Management, 25, 343-360.
Rowe, A., Fitness, J., &Wood, L. (2014). The role and functionality of emotions in feedback in university: a qualitative study. The Australian Educational Researcher, 41, 283-309.
Ryan, T., & Henderson, M. (2017). Feeling feedback: students emotional responses to educator feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-13.
Sambell, K. (2016). Assessment and feedback in higher education: considerable room for improvement? Student Engagement in Higher Education, 1, 1-14.
Sipple, S. (2007). Ideas in practice: developmental writers attitudes toward audio and written feedback. Journal of Developmental Education, 30, 22-31.
Van der Kleij. F., Adie, L., & Cimming, J. (2017). Using technology to enable student voice in assessment feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48, 1092-1105.
Värlander, S. (2008). The role of students emotions in formal feedback situations. Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 145-156.
Walker, M. (2009). An investigation into written comments on assignments: do students find them useful? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34, 67-78.
Walsh, C., Larsen, C., & Parry, D. (2009). Academic tutors at the frontline of student support in a cohort of students succeeding in higher education. Educational Studies, 35, 405-424.
Warner, R., & Miller, J. (2015). Cultural dimensions of feedback at an australian university: a study of international students with english as an additional language. Higher Education Research & Development, 34, 420-435.